Governor Abbot released details on the number of ineligible voters removed from voter rolls, including over 6,500 noncitizens, 1,930 of which have voter history
Both being voter ID eligibility states, you are highlighting the dynamic of acquiring a false identification document is far easier than matching an unseen signature. The security measure identification mandate replaced.
Give us real numbers here. How many of these people were actually dead? I promise you, they don't show up and vote. No doubt the majority, be it simple or vast, in that sub group.
For example the word "transactions" that's incredibly deceptive. Why not just say "there were yada yada yada number of dead people on the voter rolls."
That is the terminology used by the SSA website. I also discovered it’s because not every single piece of data on there is necessarily a unique registrant. Some of them can be multiple requests for verification for the same registrant, according to fact checkers reports.
What are you saying exactly? Does that contention mean you are saying that number you quoted is the amount of votes cast by either dead people or non-eligible voters? Or that's the number of people on the roll that aren't eligible? Either dead or otherwise
Allow me to start over and fake middle class for a minute. I would be most appreciative and sincerely grateful if you can overlook my lack of comprehension and except my apologies for my undeserved chastising.
Also, I will do my best to keep this thread in a single line from this point forward. Attempting communication with me is difficult. I realize that. I am now learning that I am the cause of some of that difficulty if not most of it. 🤷♂️
I hate it when I am the victim of my own Svengali!
Nothing worse or better, depending on your standing, and being hoist by one's own petard....😕
It’s number of people on the roll that were ineligible and subsequently have been removed.
They’re literally just cleaning up voter rolls.
Some people, including Timcast speculated it could be fraud, but that was contested pretty early on. The statements from Texas were kind of confusing, because ultimately it seems the data was pretty spot on based on the numbers Abbot just announced.
And the details on the SSA website are truly what sparked the speculation, because it explicitly stated the data represented NEW REGISTRANTS, even though that is not actually true.
That is why I covered it, and this recent statement just confirms that the speculation was wrong.
Although, there does seem to be 1,930 cases of potential fraud, where noncitizens have voted. They’re investigating it.
You do realize a significant number of republican states are eliminating your name from the voter registration role for no other reason then you have not participated in the last two cycles?
Just because it illegitimate politically twisted and constitutional decision was handed down by court with the same adjectives doesn't mean anything is Constitutional.
Not demanding the supreme court follow the constitution and allowing them to "interpret" it is exact culprit of our Third World shit hole residence.
Heller is incorrect, Ctizens United is incorrect and the consent to ballot access barriers is unconstitutional. The two latter egregious errors on the part of We the People are prerequisites in correct the hundreds of other errors we have consented to allow. If they are not correct, there is no path to restore the Republic.
It is completely constitutional for Congress to legislate a ratio of popular vote award model concerning the electoral college pay it is completely constitutional to mandate something like paper ballots in the message I described earlier. They can literally according to the constitution do any damn thing they wish. It is not the states prerogative. The only states prerogative again, is the location of the polling place concerning a Senate contest.
Actually, according to the constitution of United States it's not. The only single thing and I do mean the only single thing as in one thing in the entire universe of state elections that the federal government cannot regulate or legislate about is the polling place of the Senatorial contest. That's it
Obviously. That has no correlation to being justifiable. Constitutional or anything approaching the ideal that is America. Holy shit man. Intentionally obtuse is a bad optic.
Either the securities fraudster Attorney General wasted that $22 million or if it was a legitimate investigation then people claiming the 1900 and some incidences of fraudulent voting are incorrect.
The only prescient issues concerning election security are voting machines. Voting machines that have a proprietary software code. Voting machines that cost each state in the billions of dollars hundreds of thousands per county if not millions depending on how many residents of that County.
The most secure and mind you a very important dynamic in today's political structure where policy and congressional seats are for sale, not only the most secure message but by far the cheapest cost in nothing but a piece of paper in a number two pencil for each voter.
Either party or constituent truly concerned with election security would be advocating for
#HandMarkedAndCountedPaperBallots, with a secure and transparent chain of custody.
Even if the machines are correct in give the opportunity of a legitimate forensic examination by having open source software and never being connected to the Internet. Meaning the county clerk or whoever is responsible to forwarding the numbers to the state level do so by phone call, the expense is not justified.
Why aren't either party bringing that issue up? Well the paper and number two pencil lobby doesn't have the amount of palm grease the voting machine lobbies do....
That's not good enough. Ditch them. My county of less than 25,000 people have spent 300 grand plus on six of them. Using five and having one as a standby. What a waste of taxpayer money. Not even addressing the security issue. Rarely do 10,000 people vote did you know how easy that would be the count?
OK so what does that have to do with voter fraud or the Democratic Party? The narrative is incredibly and intentionally misleading. In my humble opinion...
What’s misleading about it? What narrative exactly? The one that literally contests the narrative that there was massive voter fraud by answering questions that were raised?
I never tied this to democrats, and I was clarifying the facts which actually dispel the notion that there was some major fraud operation going on.
1930 noncitizens with a voter history is hardly a concern. At least they’re being taken care of.
All of this is good. None of this is bad. And it’s not a testament to Dems, republicans, or anything. It’s simply what is.
I understand that now but the entire presentation was slanted. The average member of the electorate doesn't know the definition of the terms. That's what misleading. As I said before, if I don't know about it yeah every guy in the street doesn't. And that's not condescending, conceit or bloviation. Just reality.
Because you didn't explain it on the level that you just did right there. You would've use that verbiage if it was intended to be informative. I am somewhat knowledgeable of the body politic and current events pertaining to it. I didn't understand any of that language. the guy whose last civics education was social studies and sophomore year of high school is going to objectified and dissect that in a correct manner?
Watt? Let me get this straight you are claiming that 400,000 dead people on the voter registration rules somehow voted in the 2020 election or the 2022 midterm?
Governor Abbot and there fine upstanding citizen the Attorney General spent $22 million of taxpayer money searching for voter fraud after the 2020 election and didn't find a what does an incidence. I'm not sure they found any..
In essence, given both states have been under Republican executive and legislatures for decades, you are highlighting the inefficiency and unprofessionalality of day-to-day management of government. I'm thinking they should get things like that in order long before they send the national guard troops to perform unconstitutional actions at the border or sue China over some nonsensical bullshit that is nothing more than a dog and pony show production both states have had criminal criminal justice system stand self-serving criminal executive administrations for decades. That's the most pressure point brought to light by the examination.
No. None of these people voted. At least as far as I am aware. I never claimed they did, and I am not now.
What I am saying is that between 2021 and 2024 (to date), there were 401,180 single match deceased registrants that were discovered via the verification process the SSA offers to states, in this instance Texas.
Abbot announced they removed 1.1 million from their voter rolls total.
457,000 deceased registrants were removed. I am not claiming they voted.
There were questions as to what the data represented because the site explicitly stated that this system was to be used by states to check the SSA database against new registrants ONLY.
This was not accurate, as multiple states, including Pennsylvania, have said they use it for more than new registrations.
As I said in an earlier reply and as I said 1000 times over, unless you're talking about dropping machines entirely switching to a hand counted hand marked paper ballot method with a secure and transparent chain of custody, you shouldn't be broaching the topic of election security. If you do you're doing so from a disingenuous position.
I'm going to unpack this in multiple replies. Using the app on a phone does not allow you to refer back to the original article. I'm going to have to inject truth to your narrative one lie at a time.
Starting with, anything that comes from the current executive administration in Missouri or Texas is bullshit. Not genuine nor connected to truth. Not even coincidentally. They both are criminal administrations filled with criminals. The only thing more morally bankrupt then joining them in administration is fellating them, posing as a "journalist."
So you’re telling me that the SSA is colluding with these “criminal” administrations to push fraudulent registration data to convince people that there is a massive voter fraud campaign going on leading up to the 2024 election?
I don’t understand how you think Official SSA data and Texas voter roll data is something that needs to be “unpacked” or “debunked”.
Now I can answer that in perfect contest. No I'm not saying that I'm saying you are the one that furnish the disingenuous narrative. You used all of the verbiage that the government used for well knowing it was Greek to 99% of readers. Plain spoken blue color conversational style construction is sometimes the only way to educate plainspoken blue collar types. Like me.
No I'm not saying any of that. I'm saying the manner of presentation is the issue. Now obviously I missed the connection to the first part. I read it but I have no short term memory. I'm burnt around the edges.
Both being voter ID eligibility states, you are highlighting the dynamic of acquiring a false identification document is far easier than matching an unseen signature. The security measure identification mandate replaced.
Give us real numbers here. How many of these people were actually dead? I promise you, they don't show up and vote. No doubt the majority, be it simple or vast, in that sub group.
Data from the SSA website shows Texas had a total of 401,180 single matched deceased transactions since 2021.
What are you contesting exactly?
For example the word "transactions" that's incredibly deceptive. Why not just say "there were yada yada yada number of dead people on the voter rolls."
That is the terminology used by the SSA website. I also discovered it’s because not every single piece of data on there is necessarily a unique registrant. Some of them can be multiple requests for verification for the same registrant, according to fact checkers reports.
This was after I released the first report tho. A detail I forgot until you asked.
What are you saying exactly? Does that contention mean you are saying that number you quoted is the amount of votes cast by either dead people or non-eligible voters? Or that's the number of people on the roll that aren't eligible? Either dead or otherwise
Except.... Accept.... it's all the same, if your iPhone dictation😡😡😡
iPhone autocorrect is also trash. It used to be good till the update they did recently.
Allow me to start over and fake middle class for a minute. I would be most appreciative and sincerely grateful if you can overlook my lack of comprehension and except my apologies for my undeserved chastising.
Also, I will do my best to keep this thread in a single line from this point forward. Attempting communication with me is difficult. I realize that. I am now learning that I am the cause of some of that difficulty if not most of it. 🤷♂️
I hate it when I am the victim of my own Svengali!
Nothing worse or better, depending on your standing, and being hoist by one's own petard....😕
Haha dude no worries man. I appreciate the critique. And I’m never afraid to pick apart something I report with ya.
I’m not a professional at this stuff. I’ve been learning as I go.
It’s number of people on the roll that were ineligible and subsequently have been removed.
They’re literally just cleaning up voter rolls.
Some people, including Timcast speculated it could be fraud, but that was contested pretty early on. The statements from Texas were kind of confusing, because ultimately it seems the data was pretty spot on based on the numbers Abbot just announced.
And the details on the SSA website are truly what sparked the speculation, because it explicitly stated the data represented NEW REGISTRANTS, even though that is not actually true.
That is why I covered it, and this recent statement just confirms that the speculation was wrong.
Although, there does seem to be 1,930 cases of potential fraud, where noncitizens have voted. They’re investigating it.
You do realize a significant number of republican states are eliminating your name from the voter registration role for no other reason then you have not participated in the last two cycles?
That is their prerogative…
Just because it illegitimate politically twisted and constitutional decision was handed down by court with the same adjectives doesn't mean anything is Constitutional.
Not demanding the supreme court follow the constitution and allowing them to "interpret" it is exact culprit of our Third World shit hole residence.
Heller is incorrect, Ctizens United is incorrect and the consent to ballot access barriers is unconstitutional. The two latter egregious errors on the part of We the People are prerequisites in correct the hundreds of other errors we have consented to allow. If they are not correct, there is no path to restore the Republic.
It is completely constitutional for Congress to legislate a ratio of popular vote award model concerning the electoral college pay it is completely constitutional to mandate something like paper ballots in the message I described earlier. They can literally according to the constitution do any damn thing they wish. It is not the states prerogative. The only states prerogative again, is the location of the polling place concerning a Senate contest.
Actually, according to the constitution of United States it's not. The only single thing and I do mean the only single thing as in one thing in the entire universe of state elections that the federal government cannot regulate or legislate about is the polling place of the Senatorial contest. That's it
Obviously. That has no correlation to being justifiable. Constitutional or anything approaching the ideal that is America. Holy shit man. Intentionally obtuse is a bad optic.
Having accurate voter rolls should be a freaking given.
I agree. lol. Apparently it wasn’t already…
Either the securities fraudster Attorney General wasted that $22 million or if it was a legitimate investigation then people claiming the 1900 and some incidences of fraudulent voting are incorrect.
The only prescient issues concerning election security are voting machines. Voting machines that have a proprietary software code. Voting machines that cost each state in the billions of dollars hundreds of thousands per county if not millions depending on how many residents of that County.
The most secure and mind you a very important dynamic in today's political structure where policy and congressional seats are for sale, not only the most secure message but by far the cheapest cost in nothing but a piece of paper in a number two pencil for each voter.
Either party or constituent truly concerned with election security would be advocating for
#HandMarkedAndCountedPaperBallots, with a secure and transparent chain of custody.
Even if the machines are correct in give the opportunity of a legitimate forensic examination by having open source software and never being connected to the Internet. Meaning the county clerk or whoever is responsible to forwarding the numbers to the state level do so by phone call, the expense is not justified.
Why aren't either party bringing that issue up? Well the paper and number two pencil lobby doesn't have the amount of palm grease the voting machine lobbies do....
It should be normal practice for states to clean their voter rolls of ineligible registrants. Doing so obviously has its benefits.
And yeah, I’m with you on the voting machines. They could just open source their code.
That's not good enough. Ditch them. My county of less than 25,000 people have spent 300 grand plus on six of them. Using five and having one as a standby. What a waste of taxpayer money. Not even addressing the security issue. Rarely do 10,000 people vote did you know how easy that would be the count?
OK so what does that have to do with voter fraud or the Democratic Party? The narrative is incredibly and intentionally misleading. In my humble opinion...
What’s misleading about it? What narrative exactly? The one that literally contests the narrative that there was massive voter fraud by answering questions that were raised?
I never tied this to democrats, and I was clarifying the facts which actually dispel the notion that there was some major fraud operation going on.
1930 noncitizens with a voter history is hardly a concern. At least they’re being taken care of.
All of this is good. None of this is bad. And it’s not a testament to Dems, republicans, or anything. It’s simply what is.
I understand that now but the entire presentation was slanted. The average member of the electorate doesn't know the definition of the terms. That's what misleading. As I said before, if I don't know about it yeah every guy in the street doesn't. And that's not condescending, conceit or bloviation. Just reality.
Because you didn't explain it on the level that you just did right there. You would've use that verbiage if it was intended to be informative. I am somewhat knowledgeable of the body politic and current events pertaining to it. I didn't understand any of that language. the guy whose last civics education was social studies and sophomore year of high school is going to objectified and dissect that in a correct manner?
Watt? Let me get this straight you are claiming that 400,000 dead people on the voter registration rules somehow voted in the 2020 election or the 2022 midterm?
Governor Abbot and there fine upstanding citizen the Attorney General spent $22 million of taxpayer money searching for voter fraud after the 2020 election and didn't find a what does an incidence. I'm not sure they found any..
In essence, given both states have been under Republican executive and legislatures for decades, you are highlighting the inefficiency and unprofessionalality of day-to-day management of government. I'm thinking they should get things like that in order long before they send the national guard troops to perform unconstitutional actions at the border or sue China over some nonsensical bullshit that is nothing more than a dog and pony show production both states have had criminal criminal justice system stand self-serving criminal executive administrations for decades. That's the most pressure point brought to light by the examination.
Well that’s important to highlight. From the conversation I had with my county auditor, we’re not doing any better.
In essence as is the current dynamic facilitates your County Clerk against the GRU or the cyber spooks of the IDF. Not looking good for the home team
No. None of these people voted. At least as far as I am aware. I never claimed they did, and I am not now.
What I am saying is that between 2021 and 2024 (to date), there were 401,180 single match deceased registrants that were discovered via the verification process the SSA offers to states, in this instance Texas.
Abbot announced they removed 1.1 million from their voter rolls total.
457,000 deceased registrants were removed. I am not claiming they voted.
There were questions as to what the data represented because the site explicitly stated that this system was to be used by states to check the SSA database against new registrants ONLY.
This was not accurate, as multiple states, including Pennsylvania, have said they use it for more than new registrations.
Does that clear things up?
As I said in an earlier reply and as I said 1000 times over, unless you're talking about dropping machines entirely switching to a hand counted hand marked paper ballot method with a secure and transparent chain of custody, you shouldn't be broaching the topic of election security. If you do you're doing so from a disingenuous position.
I'm going to unpack this in multiple replies. Using the app on a phone does not allow you to refer back to the original article. I'm going to have to inject truth to your narrative one lie at a time.
Starting with, anything that comes from the current executive administration in Missouri or Texas is bullshit. Not genuine nor connected to truth. Not even coincidentally. They both are criminal administrations filled with criminals. The only thing more morally bankrupt then joining them in administration is fellating them, posing as a "journalist."
Here we go .....
So you’re telling me that the SSA is colluding with these “criminal” administrations to push fraudulent registration data to convince people that there is a massive voter fraud campaign going on leading up to the 2024 election?
I don’t understand how you think Official SSA data and Texas voter roll data is something that needs to be “unpacked” or “debunked”.
Now I can answer that in perfect contest. No I'm not saying that I'm saying you are the one that furnish the disingenuous narrative. You used all of the verbiage that the government used for well knowing it was Greek to 99% of readers. Plain spoken blue color conversational style construction is sometimes the only way to educate plainspoken blue collar types. Like me.
No I'm not saying any of that. I'm saying the manner of presentation is the issue. Now obviously I missed the connection to the first part. I read it but I have no short term memory. I'm burnt around the edges.
Putin they call him our enemy he is the only sane one
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frQkwpkSgUc
Fuck you, Ivan. And every fat, stinky vodka addled Babooshka you ever or never fucked.