“The Court ruled that Trump is immune from criminal liability for using the Justice Department to convince State’s to use his illegitimate electors instead of their legitimate ones, based on the separation of powers and that this was an official act.”
Sincere question. You don’t agree with that, right?
To me, it’s a matter of what constitutes an official act. I can’t say whether I agree or not as I’m not exactly sure what official acts would fall into their constitutionally defined Executive powers.
"The Court ruled that Trump is immune from criminal liability for using the Justice Department to convince State’s to use his illegitimate electors instead of their legitimate ones, ..."
Creative writing? I have zero recollection of this. Please elaborate.
Intentionally vague, UNCONSTITUTIONAL, legislation from the Bench.
The second and third, all this court does. When it’s not soliciting or accepting bribes, violating the Oath of Office, and side gig seditious BS.
“The Court ruled that Trump is immune from criminal liability for using the Justice Department to convince State’s to use his illegitimate electors instead of their legitimate ones, based on the separation of powers and that this was an official act.”
Sincere question. You don’t agree with that, right?
To me, it’s a matter of what constitutes an official act. I can’t say whether I agree or not as I’m not exactly sure what official acts would fall into their constitutionally defined Executive powers.
"The Court ruled that Trump is immune from criminal liability for using the Justice Department to convince State’s to use his illegitimate electors instead of their legitimate ones, ..."
Creative writing? I have zero recollection of this. Please elaborate.
Its wording pulled right from the decision.
Do you have a copy of the official decision?
Thanks for clarifying. In the furball of the last several years, I had lost track of what the actual indictment was about.
I actually covered this a while back.
https://www.intellectualdissatisfaction.com/p/a-deep-dive-into-the-45-page-indictment?r=jp1dy&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
This will go on for a long time IMO past Nov elections
This is really how it should be unless you want chaos every time a different party takes the office.
Exactly!
WUT? Immunity from espionage, sedition, inciting, obstruction, conspiracy?
What about child rape?
I think this idea that anything and everything will be exempt from criminal prosecution is not even in alignment with the ruling at all.